Children are not dogs

Yesterday I taught Kipper (Age 9 with a dx of ASD) to knit. Can dogs knit?

Kipper has been asking me to teach him for a long time, but I myself cannot knit.  He asked me to use the chicken-shaped dog clicker I purchased after a friend suggested it might help when I struggled to teach him cursive handwriting after deregistering him from a Special School (that also struggled and had informed me he would probably never write fluently and would need a computer or scribe).

The early Home Education days were hard. I spent a lot of time frustrated but trying to patiently explain how to hold the pencil, reminding him not to slip back into the thumb-wrap hold and form his letters with accuracy:

‘no, not like that, move your finger up, Daddy finger sits next to Mummy finger, not on top of her, keep your circles round, make sure your sticks come all the way to the line like I’ve told you, why is the bottom curve way below the line now, watch that thumb…….’

Way too much language for a child with ASD and most of it negative.

Introducing the clicker cut out language completely and gave very clear positive feedback of broken down steps that were built upon. At first Kipper worked for the extrinsic positive feedback of the clicker. In fact, as it had been such a negative experience up until then I had to provide further extrinsic motivation in the form of ipad minutes, just to get him to attempt handwriting again (let’s face it no-one is going to choose to write a page of ‘a’s for its intrinsic reward), but as steps were achieved and success became incremental, he worked hard for himself and the clicker became merely a guide. We then worked on fluency and accuracy together by charting, and ‘beating our time’ and now he is back in school he continues to produce beautiful fluent cursive writing simply to please himself and his teacher (intrinsically or extrinsically rewarding?). And yes, we have also taught him to type too.

So knitting. We watched several YouTube videos together. Kipper seemed to grasp how to do it, but simply could not replicate it himself. His solution was for me to do it, with him using the clicker to mark when I got it right. We did this for some time. Then we swapped and I clicked him, using 4 clicks for the basic moves, and refining and becoming more picky in what was clicked to establish better practice. He grasped it in less than 10 minutes. Neither his ASD or expressive language disorder proved to be a barrier to his learning in this way.

But here’s the thing. Clicker use for children with ASD, is generally frowned upon in education. In fact behavioural techniques are considered unethical, manipulative, normalising,  despite the fact that they are used routinely for typically developing children when reinforcing ‘wanted behaviour’ in school (stickers, HT awards, attendance assemblies, climbing/descending pegs).

And yet it was my son who requested the clicker was used, and it was he who wanted to learn how to knit (it absolutely wasn’t my idea, I hate all things crafty).  He was impatient to learn well and learn fast.

If I was ‘normalising him’ or training him to conform through dog training techniques, then you can be sure that knitting would not be the first thing that occurred to me to teach a 9yr old boy with ASD who cannot tie his shoelaces.

Ethical decisions in education are surely much more to do with ‘what?’ is taught and ‘why?’ (i.e. should valuable teaching hours be used teaching for the SPAG test? or should I have persisted with handwriting at all?) The ‘how?’ ought to simply be about efficiency and effectiveness (i.e. is the this the most effective use of a learners limited time, for them, and can they learn faster with improved techniques?). It appears to me that in the current education debate, the ‘what?/why?’ and the ‘how?’ are switched.


5 thoughts on “Children are not dogs

  1. Hi Starlight

    I completely agree with you, and it’s so easy to forget about why something is being done and the benefits. As a parent of a son with needs due to SEND, I find that there is way too much information about the ‘how’ and not enough about the ‘what’ and ‘why’. The SEND code of practice for example.

    Well done to Kipper for learning to knit. That is amazing progress. I think all of our children have the ability to tell us what and why they want to do something, but sometimes for the ones who need extra help to express their choices, the ‘how’ will often be wrong, because there is just no reason for doing it. If Kipper has success in knitting, because he is motivated to knit, the way he learns to knit is pretty much irrelevant!!

    I’ll have a cashmere batwing v-neck in pale blue please.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I have had this comment said to me many a time . Yet in 3 years no prossional has tought my daughter anything . Yet useing a clicker and the science behind it has helped me to teach her and learn myself how to teach far more than anything else . From a fellow TAGteacher ” CLICK “

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Have you ever thought about creating an ebook or guest
    authoring on other blogs? I have a blog based on the same ideas you discuss and
    would love to have you share some stories/information. I know my visitors would value your work.
    If you are even remotely interested, feel free to send me
    an e-mail.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s